2018 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ccta.2018.8511422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Between LIDAR-Based Feedforward and DAC for Control of Wind Turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholbrock et al (2016) believed that by introducing this input quantity, the controller control performance could be optimized, and it might also reduce the load of the wind turbine and increase the power generation of the wind turbine. Khaniki et al (2018) found that LiDAR-assisted feedforward control was better than pseudo-feedforward control. In summary, the collective pitch control technology based on the LiDAR wind measurement can be considered to reduce speed fluctuations and structural loads in the full-load area of wind turbines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholbrock et al (2016) believed that by introducing this input quantity, the controller control performance could be optimized, and it might also reduce the load of the wind turbine and increase the power generation of the wind turbine. Khaniki et al (2018) found that LiDAR-assisted feedforward control was better than pseudo-feedforward control. In summary, the collective pitch control technology based on the LiDAR wind measurement can be considered to reduce speed fluctuations and structural loads in the full-load area of wind turbines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%