2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between Geant4 PIXE simulations and experimental data for standard reference samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It allows to implement the particle transport physics and the creation of secondary particles, covering a wide range of energies (from eV to TeV). Geant4 allows to simulate PIXE 63 reliably, as validated by several recent works [64][65][66] . Our Monte Carlo simulations take into account protons, electrons, positrons, and photons.…”
Section: Geant4 Monte Carlo Simulation Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It allows to implement the particle transport physics and the creation of secondary particles, covering a wide range of energies (from eV to TeV). Geant4 allows to simulate PIXE 63 reliably, as validated by several recent works [64][65][66] . Our Monte Carlo simulations take into account protons, electrons, positrons, and photons.…”
Section: Geant4 Monte Carlo Simulation Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The present work is a continuation of the evaluation of the updated Geant4 fluorescence simulation capabilities, that we recently published in Francis et al [4] for a selection of complex samples. Here, we propose to investigate the performance of the version 10.1Beta public release of the Geant4 toolkit for the simulation of fluorescence spectra induced by low energy (1.5 MeV) protons on a selection of thin reference targets made of gold, platinum, gadolinium fluoride and iron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These models are accurate for energies between 250–100 GeV and can be applied down to 100 eV with a reduced accuracy [ 66 ]. Apart from that, fluorescence, Auger electrons and atomic de-excitation initiated by other electromagnetic processes have been explicitly included for energies over 100 eV [ 67 ]. In the case of muons, we have only considered electromagnetic processes, while for neutron-induced recoils, we have used the NeutronHP model.…”
Section: Background Model Of Trex-dm At Lscmentioning
confidence: 99%