2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between flat-plate and evacuated tube solar collectors in terms of energy and exergy analysis by using nanofluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In stationary type, the flat‐plate and evacuated tube is the most common collectors that are used (Figure 4). There are several studies that compare two types of the collectors 29‐32 . Evacuated tubes utilize the sun's energy effectively and then are able to achieve higher temperatures than Flat‐plate collectors for two reasons.…”
Section: Nanofluids Applications and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stationary type, the flat‐plate and evacuated tube is the most common collectors that are used (Figure 4). There are several studies that compare two types of the collectors 29‐32 . Evacuated tubes utilize the sun's energy effectively and then are able to achieve higher temperatures than Flat‐plate collectors for two reasons.…”
Section: Nanofluids Applications and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in Thailand has explored the potential of using a flat plate solar collector as a solar receiver in the ethanol distillation process, with the results showing an increase in the ethanol concentration. It was found that the distillation process using the flat plate solar collector can increase the substrate concentration from 10% to 40-50% in a single stage and up to 90% with multi-stage distillation [18,19]. Previous research has also explored the potential of utilizing thermal energy from solar radiation in ethanol distillation with solar collectors [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review shows that existing studies focus primarily on comparing, in terms of energy, vacuum collectors with flat collectors [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]. In the majority of instances, the evacuated tube collector exhibits better efficiency compared to the flat collector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, there are few studies that examine the ecological aspect of solar systems based on the vacuum tube technology. There are studies that investigate the life cycle of solar collectors; however, the majority of them are based on Embodied Energy (EE) and Embodied Carbon (EC) along with USEtox and Ecological Footprint (EF), or life cycle cost analysis [16,18,20,27,28,54,63,65,68,73,[75][76][77]. Few studies consider the LCA methodology for a perspective based on actual pollutant for impact assessment individually with a single score [59,78,79].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation