2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between different foaming methods for the synthesis of light weight geopolymers

Abstract: Foaming to reduce the density of geopolymeric materials is increasingly being reported in the literature as it has been shown to be effective in improving their insulating properties. However, there is no consistency in foaming methods and as such this study was performed to compare methods in order to better understand their effect on the properties of geopolymers. A surfactant and two chemical foaming agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
106
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide variety of routes to foamed alkali-activated materials have also been demonstrated [85][86][87][88][89][90][91], and these offer pathways to the reduction of operational energy.…”
Section: Simplified Environmental Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of routes to foamed alkali-activated materials have also been demonstrated [85][86][87][88][89][90][91], and these offer pathways to the reduction of operational energy.…”
Section: Simplified Environmental Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the control of porosity dimension is complex, good thermal insulation properties, comparable with commercial organic and inorganic thermal insulating materials were achieved [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connectivity of pores depends on the foaming methods and the use of different foaming agents. The use of alumina powder and hydrogen peroxide can generate a GFC with relatively lower connected pores than using surfactant, at even a lower density (more voids) conditions (Masi et al, 2014); the use of a combination of oleic acid and H2 solution results in more connected pores, which can significantly increase the fluid transportation rate through the geopolymer foam (unpublished data by the authors). The high connectivity of individual fine pores leads to large open and interacted pores, which lower the compressive strength but can be desirable for other purposes (Zhang et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%