1997
DOI: 10.1080/03088839700000057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between conventional and advanced handling systems for low volume container maritime terminals

Abstract: In this paper a conventional low volume maritime terminal equipped with straddle carriers is compared against an advanced automatic stacking crane/automatic guided vehicle alternative. For both configurations a convenient layout was designed, a reasonable level of service (common for both terminals) was adopted, and the required amount of equipment was determined using computer simulation. The results indicate that the total cost per container and the area requirements do not differ considerably between the tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Port capacity can be increased by physically expanding existing ones (McCalla, 1999), but this is at considerable cost and effort (Pellegram, 2001). Other options include adding conventional equipment or improving the productivity by new forms of technology as analysed by Ballis et al (1997), work organisation as suggested by Paixão and Marlow (2003) or by information systems such as elaborated by Henesey (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Port capacity can be increased by physically expanding existing ones (McCalla, 1999), but this is at considerable cost and effort (Pellegram, 2001). Other options include adding conventional equipment or improving the productivity by new forms of technology as analysed by Ballis et al (1997), work organisation as suggested by Paixão and Marlow (2003) or by information systems such as elaborated by Henesey (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In scientific literature, many contributions are available on the HCS of container ports, such as single-equipment scheduling, resources allocation and integrated scheduling (Han et al, 2010;Luo et al,2011;Said et al,2015;Türkoğulları et al, 2016) [6][7][8][9] in order to increase efficiency. Many methodologies, such as adopting new technologies, work organization models and information systems (Ballis et al, 1997;Paixão et al, 2003;Facchini et al, 2017) [10][11][12] have been proposed to identify optimal solutions in the planning and management of container port HCS to reduce transit time and related operation costs. Traditionally, the HCS in container ports have been studied separately and independently for the three main machines.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In QSMC and ISMC, the exponential reaching law in (10) is employed and the saturation function is used to replace sign function to reduce chattering. According to (10), ε=0.5, ∆=0.05, k=1 in QSMC and ISMC; and according to (33), α=0.8, β=4 in SMC-P.…”
Section: B Power Integral Reaching Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the second Panama Canal expansion (which may be considered as necessary in order to serve larger vessels) is practically infeasible (Ashar, 2013). In order to meet the growing demand for the waterborne trade, along with construction of new ports (McCalla, 1999), the port operations efficiency can be increased through: 1 -new technology deployment for enhancing the operational efficiency of the conventional equipment (Ballis, Golias, & Abarkoumkin, 1997), 2 -deployment of innovative information systems (Henesey, 2004), and 3 -work organization improvement (Paixao & Bernard Marlow, 2003). The remainder of this dissertation is structured as follows.…”
Section: Source: Unctad 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%