2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on the weak Galerkin, discontinuous Galerkin, and mixed finite element methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated in [18,19] that the numerical pressures, velocities obtained from using the WGFEM and the MFEM have negligible differences, when the permeability in the Darcy equation is a piecewise constant scalar.…”
Section: Mfem For Darcymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has been demonstrated in [18,19] that the numerical pressures, velocities obtained from using the WGFEM and the MFEM have negligible differences, when the permeability in the Darcy equation is a piecewise constant scalar.…”
Section: Mfem For Darcymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is an obvious advantage over the classical mixed finite element method, which results in indefinite linear systems and special solvers, e.g., the Uzawa algorithm, need to be used. WGFEM holds also advantages over the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method [19], which proliferates in number of unknowns and involves problem-dependent penalty factors.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, the weak Galerkin finite element method has attracted much attention in the field of numerical partial differential equations [7,9,10,11,13,15,16,17,18,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%