The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on the microstructure and surface property evaluation of coatings produced from nanostructured and conventional WC–Co powders HVOF-sprayed on Al7075

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the fluctuation of the friction coefficient and the running-in period both decreased in duration with the increasing temperature, probably due to the lower initial resistance to the conformation between the two sliding surfaces as a result of the formation of larger amounts of the oxide films with lubricating properties at higher temperatures. This also suggests that there was a more efficient activation of wear protection processes at higher temperatures, which can be attributed to the more uniform distribution of the lubricating oxides over the wear track and the more active sites for oxidation induced by the larger fraction of interphase boundaries [40]. The average values for the friction coefficient during the steady period, R a , of the worn surfaces and the wear rate are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Friction and Wear Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, the fluctuation of the friction coefficient and the running-in period both decreased in duration with the increasing temperature, probably due to the lower initial resistance to the conformation between the two sliding surfaces as a result of the formation of larger amounts of the oxide films with lubricating properties at higher temperatures. This also suggests that there was a more efficient activation of wear protection processes at higher temperatures, which can be attributed to the more uniform distribution of the lubricating oxides over the wear track and the more active sites for oxidation induced by the larger fraction of interphase boundaries [40]. The average values for the friction coefficient during the steady period, R a , of the worn surfaces and the wear rate are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Friction and Wear Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A standard three electrode cell (with Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode and a platinum gauze as the counter electrode) was R connected to the Gill AC potensiostat/galvanostat by ACM Instruments. The corrosion current densities were determined by Tafel extrapolation, by conforming to several criteria analytically documented in previous efforts [36,37]. Reverse (or cyclic) polarization at a scan rate of 10 mV/min was carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of the rebars to localized corrosion.…”
Section: Electrochemical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative hysteresis loop (i.e. a loop formed by anodic reverse scans corresponding to higher current densities than the current densities of the forward scans) signifies occurrence of localized corrosion [37]. Two types of electrolyte were used: a) The first electrolyte contained (1.8-1.8x/100) g of agglomerates of Ca(OH) 2 per l of an AR mimicking solution (pH=3.1).…”
Section: Electrochemical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main concept of this technique is that pitting would occur if the current density of the anodic portion of the return scan is higher than the current density of the forward scan for the same anodic potential [41]. This type of hysteresis is labelled as "negative hysteresis" (More details can be found in [42]). …”
Section: Corrosion Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%