The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.3390/polym11010153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study on the Characterization of Nanofibers with Cellulose I, I/II, and II Polymorphs from Wood

Abstract: Polymorphic changes in cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) are closely related to their properties and applications, and it is of interest to investigate how polymorphic changes influence their properties. A comparative study on the properties of CNFs with cellulose I, I/II, and II polymorphs from wood was conducted herein. CNFs were obtained by chemical extraction combined with a simple and efficient mechanical treatment (one pass through a grinder). This process resulted in a relatively high yield of 80–85% after a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recovery of the tensile modulus and strength of the CNF/PVDF composites at higher loadings (>2 wt %) could be attributed to increased fiber entanglement and/or increased crystallinity of the composites. The worse bulk performance of the TOCNF/PVDF samples, at higher loadings, is likely due to the loss of fibril crystallinity and transformation to cellulose II following the cellulose oxidation treatment, which reduces the tensile strength of the fibrils [71], as well as the reduced crystallinity of the TOCNF/PVDF films. Interestingly, the surface mechanical properties of the TOCNF/PVDF composites, from 1 to 4 wt %, are better than those of neat PVDF and CNF/PVDF composites of similar loading.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery of the tensile modulus and strength of the CNF/PVDF composites at higher loadings (>2 wt %) could be attributed to increased fiber entanglement and/or increased crystallinity of the composites. The worse bulk performance of the TOCNF/PVDF samples, at higher loadings, is likely due to the loss of fibril crystallinity and transformation to cellulose II following the cellulose oxidation treatment, which reduces the tensile strength of the fibrils [71], as well as the reduced crystallinity of the TOCNF/PVDF films. Interestingly, the surface mechanical properties of the TOCNF/PVDF composites, from 1 to 4 wt %, are better than those of neat PVDF and CNF/PVDF composites of similar loading.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mongolica after alkali treatment displayed changes in crystalline structure marked by spectral changes including a decrease in intensity of the band from 1428 cm −1 and a shift at 1418 cm −1 . Additionally, the disappearance of the peak at 1507 cm −1 from purified wood pulp was attributed to the removal of lignin, while the peak at 1737 cm −1 was attributed to the leaching of hemicellulose after treatments with alkali [63].…”
Section: Quality Marker Regions and Their Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the primary and secondary diffraction peaks at 2θ = 21.0° and 16.5° of RCF, the primary and secondary diffraction peaks of 2θ = 21.9° and 17.5° shift toward right when the concentration of nanocellulose is 0.1% in the ANF. The phenomenon indicates that the content of cellulose-I was signi cantly reduced and cellulose-II was increased gradually when the concentration of added nanocellulose is 0.1% and further indicates the transformation of cellulose-I to cellulose-II in the ANF [15] . This may be caused by the formation of holes in the sample after ultrasonic treatment during the preparation of cellulose, and the formation of a certain molecular orientation due to a small amount of nanocellulose, which further deepened the trend of conversion to cellulose-II [11] .…”
Section: Xrd Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%