2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on subjective feeling of engine acceleration sound by automobile types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Jennings et al ( [27], (p. 1263)) argued, "perception of the sounds of on-road cars is affected by stimuli for other senses (e.g., visual and vibrational), and the fact that an assessor is also concentrating on driving." To illustrate, research in a listening room by Park et al [28] found that loudness was predictive of perceived sportiness (r � 0.84) but negatively predictive of perceived comfort (r � −0.83), consistent with the generally accepted "trade-off hypothesis of pleasantness and power" ( [29] p. 1203). A driving simulator study by Hellier et al [30], however, found that drivers regarded no engine noise at all as uncomfortable.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…As Jennings et al ( [27], (p. 1263)) argued, "perception of the sounds of on-road cars is affected by stimuli for other senses (e.g., visual and vibrational), and the fact that an assessor is also concentrating on driving." To illustrate, research in a listening room by Park et al [28] found that loudness was predictive of perceived sportiness (r � 0.84) but negatively predictive of perceived comfort (r � −0.83), consistent with the generally accepted "trade-off hypothesis of pleasantness and power" ( [29] p. 1203). A driving simulator study by Hellier et al [30], however, found that drivers regarded no engine noise at all as uncomfortable.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States). With reference to previous studies that measured the subjective feeling of users through a questionnaire [19][20][21][22], all subjective ratings in this study were evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale. To neglect the order effect, the samples were given in a randomized order.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven parameters are adopted to reflect the objective performance of fan noise. The objective parameters of the sound samples were calculated with sound analysis software Head ArtemiS, the description and calculation process are introduced in reference, [7][8][9][10][11] and the analysis results under 3000 r/min are shown as an example in Figure 4. The ordinates from left to right and top to bottom are respectively sound pressure (Pa), A-weighted SPL (dB(A)), loudness (sone), sharpness (acum), roughness (asper), fluctuation (vacil), tonality (tu), and Articulation Index (%).…”
Section: Noise Sample Processing and Psychoacoustic Parameters Calcul...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The groundwork on the sound quality of products was laid by Zwicker 5 and Fastl 6 based on psychoacoustics. Some parameters were introduced 7–11 including loudness, sharpness, roughness, tonality, etc., to objectively describe the human feeling toward product sounds, which are affected by the inherent characteristics of sound and the physiological and psychological aspects of the evaluators. Sound quality optimization of products has gradually found numerous applications in home supplies, 12,13 the automotive industry 1416 or architecture appliance industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%