2006
DOI: 10.1163/156856106777144336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of three adhesion tests (EN 582, similar to ASTM C633, LASAT (LASer Adhesion Test), and bulge and blister test) performed on plasma sprayed copper deposited on aluminium 2017 substrates

Abstract: International audienceThe aim of this study was to compare three adhesion tests carried out on plasma-sprayed copper coatings on aluminium substrates. The first test, the bond pull test, designated EN 582 or ASTM C633, involves a uniaxial static stress and is commonly used in the coating industry. The second test, the LASAT (LASer Adhesion Test), is a recently developed technique based on spallation phenomenon due to laser induced shock waves. In this test, the coating delamination results from spallation at t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, such high stress levels are induced by a dynamic shockwave but only driven during a few nanoseconds if compared to a nearly static test like is the pull‐out test. Nevertheless, it has been stated that the LASAT could be compared with a good agreement to other adhesion tests applied to thermal spray coatings 22. In such measuring range, a standard error was estimated to be around 0.7 kJ m −2 (or 0.01 GW cm −2 ) that corresponded to a ±15 MPa deviation on the calculated maximum stress.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, such high stress levels are induced by a dynamic shockwave but only driven during a few nanoseconds if compared to a nearly static test like is the pull‐out test. Nevertheless, it has been stated that the LASAT could be compared with a good agreement to other adhesion tests applied to thermal spray coatings 22. In such measuring range, a standard error was estimated to be around 0.7 kJ m −2 (or 0.01 GW cm −2 ) that corresponded to a ±15 MPa deviation on the calculated maximum stress.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…More recent works on such thick metallic or ceramic coatings obtained by CVD,16 thermal spraying,17–20 and cold spraying,21 ascertained that such laser technique could be applied to measure the interface strength of various thick, porous, and rough coating systems. A comparative study has been completed in the case of half‐millimeter thick plasma‐sprayed copper coatings onto Al‐based substrate by Arrigoni et al22 The LASAT was compared to the tensile adhesion test, namely pull‐out test (ASTM C633) and also to the “bulge and blister” test. The discrimination and ranking of the different adhesion levels were checked to be all in keeping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), [27]- [29], more intensive studies are required for process optimisation, [30] and to define correlations between process parameters, coating composition and the microstructure obtained [31], [32], physical and mechanical properties of coatings, including bonding interface properties [33], coating thickness and the achieved coating adherence strength. Different qualitative or quantitative methods allow assessing the adhesion strength of thermally sprayed coatings [34]- [36], e.g. scratching test, tensile test, shear test, LASer adhesion test, bulge and blister test, interfacial indentation test and three-point bend test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Laser Shockwave Technique (LST), initially developed for determining adhesion of thin films and coatings to substrates [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], a high-energy pulsed laser generates a compressive shock wave at the upper surface of a test sample. The compressive shock traverses the specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%