A Comparative Study of the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris After Using Different Types of Glide Path Files

Abdallah, Mai A.; Am, Zaazou; Mokhless, Nayera

doi:10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57861

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the present study, mandibular molar teeth were used, and both mesio-buccal and mesio-lingual curved canals were prepared. This was in consistency with De-Deus et al(2015) (4) and Abdallah et al (2017) (12) that preferred using mesial roots of lower molars. Considering that, these canals are frequently narrow and might show accentuated curves that possibly will complicate the debridement and shaping procedures (12) .…”

Section: Discussion:-supporting

confidence: 90%

“…This was in consistency with De-Deus et al(2015) (4) and Abdallah et al (2017) (12) that preferred using mesial roots of lower molars. Considering that, these canals are frequently narrow and might show accentuated curves that possibly will complicate the debridement and shaping procedures (12) . This was in an attempt to reduce the gap between the laboratorial settings and the challenging real-life clinical situations (4) (12 Considering that, the amount of extruded debris might be influenced by the final instrument size (13) and for standardization in methodology,tip standardization was attempt.…”

Section: Discussion:-supporting

confidence: 90%

“…And account for the greater tendency of the file for pumping the irrigating solution and pushing the debris apically through the foramen, as limited space is available to urge debris out the canal in a coronal direction (43) On the other hand, in case of mechanical glide path instrumentation using PathFiles, the continuous rotation kinematics of the files combined with the outward brushing motion could improve coronal transportation of dentine chips and debris by acting like a screw conveyor. Accordingly, the debris trapped in the apical part of the NiTi file could be lifted efficiently in the coronal direction during rotation (45) .The results of this study were in accordance with Ha et al (2016) (41) ,Abdallah et al (2017) (42) who found that creating the glide path using NiTi rotary files produced lower amounts of debris extrusion than using manual St.St. K-files.…”

Section: Groups Apically Extruded Debris (G)supporting

confidence: 87%

“…Considering that, these canals are frequently narrow and might show accentuated curves that possibly will complicate the debridement and shaping procedures (12) . This was in an attempt to reduce the gap between the laboratorial settings and the challenging real-life clinical situations (4) (12 Considering that, the amount of extruded debris might be influenced by the final instrument size (13) and for standardization in methodology,tip standardization was attempt. Both systems had a tip diameter equivalent to size 25, thus, the size of apical enlargement of the experimental groups were equivalent.…”

Section: Discussion:-mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…hand K-type Files extruded significantly more debris than the mechanical glide path performed by NiTi rotary PathFiles. The current results could possibly be explained by differences in the movement kinematics and instrument geometric designs between systems (41) (42) The possible rationalization for more apical extrusion of debris in case of manual glide path instrumentation using K-files is that, in the apical one third; the manual file acts as a piston (43) . This could feasibly induce greater pressure apically (44) .…”

Section: Groups Apically Extruded Debris (G)mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Produced by Waveone Gold and Protaper Next After Using Mechanical or Manual Glide Path Techniques

Rabea¹,

Kamel²,

Din³

et al. 2019

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris produced byWaveOne Gold (WOG) and ProTaper Next (PTN) after using mechanical or manual glide path techniques. Methodology: Forty freshly extracted human permanent mandibular first molars were collected and randomly assigned into one of the two main groups (I&II) (n=20 for each group) according to the instrumentation techniques used using either the WOG or the PTN, then each group was randomly subdivided into two subgroups (A&B) (n=10 for each subgroup) according to the type of instrument used to create the glide path using either the PathFiles (PF) or the K-Files (KF). During instrumentation, the apically extruded debris (AED) was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. Then tubes were incubated at 70° C for 5 days. The net weight of the apically extruded debris was calculated in gram by subtracting the pre-weight of the empty tubes from the post-weight. The data were statistically analyzed. Results: Using the WOG/KF was statistically significantly associated with the highest amount of the AED followed by the PTN/KF and WOG/PF with no significant difference between them while the PTN/PF was statistically significantly associated with lowest amount of the AED. Conclusions: Although all systems caused apical extrusion of debris, using the multi-file continuous rotary system with mechanical glide path files could be considered as a promising and reliable approach to prepare the root canal with less amount of debris extruded apically.

show abstract

Section: Discussion:-supporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussion:-supporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Groups Apically Extruded Debris (G)supporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Discussion:-mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Groups Apically Extruded Debris (G)mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Produced by Waveone Gold and Protaper Next After Using Mechanical or Manual Glide Path Techniques

Rabea¹,

Kamel²,

Din³

et al. 2019

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically using reciprocating versus continuous rotation single file with rotary and hand glide path file

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chemomechanical root canal preparation (CMRCP) is an important step in root canal treatment. However, one of its negative consequences is apical extrusion of debris of the root canal system contributing to treatment failure and flare-ups. Glide path preparation (GPP) is the initial phase of CMRCP and is crucial for assessing root canal anatomy and establishing unobstructed access to the apical part of the canal. Materials and methods: Forty human mandibular permanent central and lateral incisors were selected; the debris collection apparatus was prepared and the teeth were then divided into four groups: Group 1: Rotary glide path preparation with ProGlider followed by instrumentation with Wave One files. Group 2: Rotary glide path preparation with ProGlider followed by instrumentation with One Shape files. Group 3: Hand glide path preparation with K-file followed by instrumentation with Wave One files. Group 4: Hand glide path preparation with K-file followed by instrumentation with One Shape files. The collected debris was weighed in an analytical digital balance and the collected data were statistically analyzed. Results: No significant difference was present between groups with the same method of glide path preparation or between Wave One and One Shape files. Rotary glide path preparation produced less debris than hand preparation (p≤0.05). Conclusions: Extrusion of debris was observed in all test groups. Rotary glide path preparation could be preferred in clinical practice as it is associated with less debris extrusion than the manual method.

show abstract

Effect of different glide path establishing systems on apically extruded debris in curved root canals – An in vitro study

Swarnakar,

Nagpal,

Singh

et al. 2023

Endodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different glide path establishing systems when used along with WaveOne Gold (WOG) single-file reciprocating system and ProTaper Gold (PTG) rotary multifile system on apically extruded debris in curved root canals. Methods: Eighty extracted mandibular molar teeth with curved mesial roots were selected for this study. Specimens were randomly divided into eight experimental groups according to the root canal preparation (n = 10): Group 1 (WOG + H and K-file), Group 2 (WOG+ G-Files),Group 3 (WOG+ One G), Group 4 (WOG + ProGlider), Group 5 (PTG + Hand K-file), Group 6 (PTG+ G-Files), Group7 (PTG+ One G), and Group 8 (PTG + ProGlider). Roots were attached to preweighed Eppendorf tubes. All instruments were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions. During root canal preparation, 8 mL of distilled water was used for each specimen. Apically extruded debris was collected in Eppendorf tubes. After the completion of root canal preparation, Eppendorf tubes were removed from the specimens and stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. Eppendorf tubes were weighed after evaporation to calculate the amount of extruded debris. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey’s test at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the ProGlider and K-file groups. The ProGlider group was associated with significantly less debris extrusion than the K-file group for both the shaping systems used: WOG (P = 0.048) and PTG (P = 0.044). There was no statistically significant difference between NiTi rotary glide path files: ProGlider, G-Files, and One G files. All experimental groups caused apical debris extrusion. Conclusion: Among all mechanical glide path files tested, ProGlider showed the least debris extrusion which was significantly less than K-file. Glide path preparation using NiTi rotary files in combination with rotary shaping files (PTG) was associated with less apical debris extrusion than the rotary glide path files used along with reciprocating file (WOG).

show abstract

A Comparative Study of the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris After Using Different Types of Glide Path Files

Cited by 6 publications

References 32 publications

Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Produced by Waveone Gold and Protaper Next After Using Mechanical or Manual Glide Path Techniques

Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Produced by Waveone Gold and Protaper Next After Using Mechanical or Manual Glide Path Techniques

Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically using reciprocating versus continuous rotation single file with rotary and hand glide path file

Effect of different glide path establishing systems on apically extruded debris in curved root canals – An in vitro study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About