2014
DOI: 10.1080/1360080x.2014.936093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the perceptions of professional staff on their contribution to student outcomes

Abstract: This study examined the perceptions of professional staff on their contribution to student outcomes. An online Delphi survey method was used to collect data from two expert panels: professional staff based in faculties and professional staff based in central university departments. The aim of this method is for the panels to arrive at a consensus. The expert panels were asked to rank ten propositions which support successful student outcomes. After three rounds the faculty based panel had reached only a 'very … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eustacia, likewise, reflected that her role has less to do with her job description than how she applied her expertise. Our experience in these positions further reinforces the importance of recognising the diversity and opportunity that exist among different subcategories of professional staff, and third space staff in particular (Melling, 2019;Regan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Structural Factorssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eustacia, likewise, reflected that her role has less to do with her job description than how she applied her expertise. Our experience in these positions further reinforces the importance of recognising the diversity and opportunity that exist among different subcategories of professional staff, and third space staff in particular (Melling, 2019;Regan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Structural Factorssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Since a substantial amount of literature about higher education work focuses on academic staff (Blackmore, Chambers, Huxley, & Thackwray, 2010), ambiguity still surrounds the professional identities and work of other higher education staff (Graham, 2012;Regan, Dollard, & Banks, 2014). Extant research has highlighted the 'rising aspirational and professional needs' of third space professionals (Sebalj et al, 2012, p. 468), yet suggest such staff are still 'comparatively impotent or largely invisible' (Gray, 2015, p. 546).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is not meant to provide a meaningful comparison between student and staff perception. However, staff perception is relevant as they contribute to positive student outcomes ( Regan et al, 2014 ). For both academic years, the difficulty was reported as intermediate by half of the staff, and a majority of staff considered time was adequate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been limited research on the careers of professional staff within universities, a potential oversight considering the increased reliance on professional management in universities (Regan, Dollard, & Banks, 2014). Consequently, little is known about how staff enact their careers in relation to their values, needs, attitudes and behaviours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%