Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3388142.3388167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Subject-Dependent and Subject-Independent Strategies for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition using LSTM Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of five was considered to separate the low and high valence classes as commonly performed in many other works such as Refs. [ 58 , 60 , 61 , 73 , 74 , 76 , 77 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. This threshold value is typically chosen to overcome the class imbalance issue in the DEAP dataset [ 64 , 67 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…of five was considered to separate the low and high valence classes as commonly performed in many other works such as Refs. [ 58 , 60 , 61 , 73 , 74 , 76 , 77 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. This threshold value is typically chosen to overcome the class imbalance issue in the DEAP dataset [ 64 , 67 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEG emotion recognition approaches can be divided into subject-dependent and subject-independent [ 46 , 73 ]. Subject-dependent methods train a separate model for each subject within the dataset.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental results on the benchmark emotion datasets of EEG and facial expression show that the proposed method is significantly better than those state-of-the-art methods. Nath et al (2020) compared the emotion recognition effects of LSTM with KNN, SVM, DT, and RF. Among them, LSTM has the best robustness and accuracy.…”
Section: Deep Learning For Eeg Emotion Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researches only consider one of the features in the time-domain and frequency-domain, which will lead to insufficient feature extraction of EEG signal and the problem of low recognition accuracy. Only a few studies achieve high accuracy by fully combining time-domain and frequency-domain features [16]. For image and signal data, good data pre-processing can effectively reduce noise data, thus effectively improving accuracy [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%