2019
DOI: 10.1109/mits.2019.2903518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Algorithms for Vehicle Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our mAP agrees with those reported in [70,71]. In the first, an 81.09% mAP was obtained for moving vehicle detection.…”
Section: Results Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nevertheless, our mAP agrees with those reported in [70,71]. In the first, an 81.09% mAP was obtained for moving vehicle detection.…”
Section: Results Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results show the value of DetectNet as an object detection model based on coverage maps rather than the anchor-based models such as Faster R-CNN, SSD, and R-FCN [76]. Although they share the same backbone architecture in some cases, the bounding box extraction strategy may show different performance for specific scenarios [77]. However, further studies are needed to understand the effects of deep learning architectures in the generation of covering maps [78].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vibration information obtained during the operating period of the IWM represents its operating conditions. Therefore, it is vital to select and extract highly sensitive SPs from the vibration signals for fault diagnosis and fault-type recognition [35]. However, the mechanical fault features of the IWM are often concealed by the effect of different speeds and different road levels; therefore, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the normal and abnormal states in order to obtain highly sensitive SPs.…”
Section: Selection Of Highly Sensitive Sps For Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%