2011
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10011-1085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Salivary Composition of HIV Seropositive Patients on HAART and Not on HAART

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 10 ] In contrast Johar et al . [ 11 ] reported increased salivary flow rate in patients on HAART, whereas Lin et al . [ 12 ] and Pavithra et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 ] In contrast Johar et al . [ 11 ] reported increased salivary flow rate in patients on HAART, whereas Lin et al . [ 12 ] and Pavithra et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 15 ] However there is no conclusive evidence in the literature as to how these drugs can alter salivary secretion and composition. [ 16 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in line with several reports [ 13 , 23 , 29 ]. Indeed, the benefits of ART in increasing SFR are suggested when we observed that 82% of the studied patients had their SFR (≥ 0.3 ml/min) within the normal range of unstimulated SFR (0.3–0.4 ml/min) [ 14 , 37 , 38 ]. In fact, Cherian AP et al noted that in symptomatic patients at the AIDS stage SFR was very low (0.11ml/min) compared to asymptomatic patients and patients on ART [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%