Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7 2005
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044704-9/50116-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of refinery fuel gas oxy-fuel combustion options for CO2 capture using simulated process data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors recommended the combustion process improvement via dividing the OTR into a series of units and adding the fuel at stages along the reactor network. Zanganeh et al used simulated process data to provide a comparison between different options for CO 2 capture in the case of refinery oxy‐fuel combustion. They conducted simulations and cost analysis for oxycombustion combined with CO 2 capturing of 2‐refinery fuel gases considering four different modes of combustion.…”
Section: Oxy‐fuel Combustion In Otrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors recommended the combustion process improvement via dividing the OTR into a series of units and adding the fuel at stages along the reactor network. Zanganeh et al used simulated process data to provide a comparison between different options for CO 2 capture in the case of refinery oxy‐fuel combustion. They conducted simulations and cost analysis for oxycombustion combined with CO 2 capturing of 2‐refinery fuel gases considering four different modes of combustion.…”
Section: Oxy‐fuel Combustion In Otrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value References TECHNICAL CO2 capture ratio % 90 Kuramochi et al (2012a) Oxygen production GJe/tO2 0.7 a ZEP (2011) Stoichiometric O2:CO2 combustion ratio (weight basis) b Natural gas 1.77 Refinery gas 1.45 Allam et al (2005a); IEA GHG (2000) Excess oxygen use % 3 Zanganeh et al (2004) Fuel savings furnaces b % 8.3 Allam et al (2005aAllam et al ( , 2005b) CO2 treatment & compression GJe/tCO2 0.5 IEA GHG (2005b) CAPEX Furnace modification c MD /MtCO2/y 1 c Allam et al (2005aAllam et al ( , 2005b) Air Separation Unit (ASU) MD /ktO2/d 51 d Allam et al (2005aAllam et al ( , 2005b Allam et al (2005aAllam et al ( , 2005b a The current specific energy requirement for cryogenic oxygen production was found to be in the range of 0.6-0.8GJe/tO2 (160-220 kWhe/tO2) (ZEP, 2011). b Assumptions were made on the stoichiometric O2:CO2 combustion ratio due to insufficient information on the fuel composition in the refinery.…”
Section: Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subbituminous coal (Highvale), at which composition is given in Table 3.15, is assumed as the fuel burned in producing electricity. The conversion efficiency of the coal plant is 42% [Zanganeh et al, 2004] and its equivalent CO 2 emission is calculated based on the high heating value (HHV) of the Highvale coal. additional HX operation is added (HTEX-4C) to produce steam for power generation.…”
Section: Process Parameters and Aspen Plus Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%