2017
DOI: 10.3390/w9100734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation by Eight Methods with FAO Penman–Monteith Method in Southwestern China

Abstract: Potential evapotranspiration (PET) is crucial for water resources assessment. In this regard, the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization)-Penman-Monteith method (PM) is commonly recognized as a standard method for PET estimation. However, due to requirement of detailed meteorological data, the application of PM is often constrained in many regions. Under such circumstances, an alternative method with similar efficiency to that of PM needs to be identified. In this study, three radiation-based methods, Makkink … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
63
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We think that the following two ways could be considered: To estimate the ET 0 using a variety of methods. Since the PM‐FAO method may cause obvious energy imbalance due to the difference of regional characteristics, such as climatic condition and land cover, we recommend to combine the PM method and a variety of radiation‐based and temperature‐based methods (Lang et al, ). The most suitable method for local use should be determined through comparative analyses and data validation based on the Bowen‐ratio, flux tower data, or lysimeter data. The fully parameterized PM method should be a good choice in sparsely vegetated regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think that the following two ways could be considered: To estimate the ET 0 using a variety of methods. Since the PM‐FAO method may cause obvious energy imbalance due to the difference of regional characteristics, such as climatic condition and land cover, we recommend to combine the PM method and a variety of radiation‐based and temperature‐based methods (Lang et al, ). The most suitable method for local use should be determined through comparative analyses and data validation based on the Bowen‐ratio, flux tower data, or lysimeter data. The fully parameterized PM method should be a good choice in sparsely vegetated regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seasonal variability of potential evapotranspiration plays a crucial role in influencing hydrological regime, thus impacting the vegetation dynamics including seasonal agricultural crops' water demand (Liu et al 2015). The evaluation significantly supports in various applications including irrigation plan and understanding climate change impacts (Lang et al 2017). The maps were produced for kharif, rabi and zaid seasons utilizing the long-term PET at the district level of India.…”
Section: Potential Evapotranspiration Pattern Analysismentioning
confidence: 81%
“…But in reality, all existing most temperature-based methods directly or indirectly incorporate radiation, at least in the form of sunshine hours [21]. Even these methods do not perform equally well [15] at all locations without calibrations [5,7,16]. For instance, Medeiros et al [18] propose the method of correction based on error autocorrelation and linear regression for local estimates improvement for temperature-based ET estimation methods.…”
Section: Plots Of the Three Methods Against Et-pm And Curve Fitting Wmentioning
confidence: 99%