Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3160489.3160499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of online and face-to-face embedded systems learning course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be inferred from the foregoing that the web-based learning mode does not yield negative response in respect of the performance of students who offered all the four mechanical engineering courses, thus making it a reliable alternative to in-person or at least a suitable complement to in-person in the online-offline hybrid mode during the ongoing COVID-19 era and other inevitable constraints in the future. Self-regulation, flexibility, and continuity in learning, which have been identified as key merits of the online learning mode [6], confirm the choice of the online mode as a suitable alternative [26][27][28] or complement to in-person learning in the online-offline hybrid mode, otherwise known as the blended learning mode, which has been advocated in a number of previous studies [23,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: -Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It can be inferred from the foregoing that the web-based learning mode does not yield negative response in respect of the performance of students who offered all the four mechanical engineering courses, thus making it a reliable alternative to in-person or at least a suitable complement to in-person in the online-offline hybrid mode during the ongoing COVID-19 era and other inevitable constraints in the future. Self-regulation, flexibility, and continuity in learning, which have been identified as key merits of the online learning mode [6], confirm the choice of the online mode as a suitable alternative [26][27][28] or complement to in-person learning in the online-offline hybrid mode, otherwise known as the blended learning mode, which has been advocated in a number of previous studies [23,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: -Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although remote hardware access has been used in teaching before [2,5,12], all previous works featured custom-built tools with costly development and high necessary maintenance. We investigated the viability of avoiding complex custom-made systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the COVID-19 pandemic caused a surge of emergency remote teaching [1] (a rapid switch to online education), comparative studies of online and offline education are limited. Chung et al managed to do that to some extent [5] -they formulated a list of necessary components that online education of embedded systems requires to be viable: 1) student-teacher interaction, 2) independent learning skills, 3) well-designed learning content and 4) tangible support. However, they operate in the context of high schools, so their conclusions may not be directly applicable in our setting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many embedded systems and networking training courses for students and engineers already exist [2]- [10] but most of these training courses are designed for university students. University students use embedded systems provided in class to test micro-controller units (MCU) input/output (I/O) and simple peripherals such as serial communication devices.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%