2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2015.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of metaheuristic optimization approaches for directional overcurrent relays coordination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
122
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
122
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these heuristic‐based computing algorithms are genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony algorithm, various variants of differential evolution (DE) algorithm, firefly algorithm, teaching learning optimization algorithm, artificial bees colony, flower pollination algorithm (FPA), symbiotic organism search optimization, and many more, which have been attempted to solve the relay coordination problems under various network topologies. In the study of Alam et al, 5 meta‐heuristic optimization methods are considered to solve the optimal relay coordination with comprehensive comparisons of their performances. In which the meta‐heuristic optimization methods are GA, particle swarm optimization, DE, harmony search optimizer, and seeker algorithm are analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these heuristic‐based computing algorithms are genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony algorithm, various variants of differential evolution (DE) algorithm, firefly algorithm, teaching learning optimization algorithm, artificial bees colony, flower pollination algorithm (FPA), symbiotic organism search optimization, and many more, which have been attempted to solve the relay coordination problems under various network topologies. In the study of Alam et al, 5 meta‐heuristic optimization methods are considered to solve the optimal relay coordination with comprehensive comparisons of their performances. In which the meta‐heuristic optimization methods are GA, particle swarm optimization, DE, harmony search optimizer, and seeker algorithm are analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected DG technology is a synchronous type, operating nominally at 0.9 lagging power factor. The detail information about the system is given in [18,31,33]. The CT ratio for each relay is considered to be 200:1.…”
Section: B Test System 2: Ieee 30-bus Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the experiences are accelerated by factors c 1 and c 2 , and random numbers r 1 and r 2 , generated between [0, 1], whereas the present movement is multiplied by an inertia factor w. More details about the basic conceptualization of PSO can be found in [26,27]. Several popular variants of PSO are classical PSO [28], time-varying acceleration coefficients PSO (T-PSO) [29], and constriction PSO (K-PSO) [30].…”
Section: Review Of Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%