1984
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(84)90052-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of ELISA and other methods for the detection of Brucella antibodies in bovine sera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to selection techniques, such as the use of pigs 2 to 3 months of age, which are susceptible to infection with B. suis but have very limited ability to produce antibody (16). There may also be a lack of antibody response in the very early stages of infection, or seronegative animals may have been infected without exhibiting any serological or clinical evidence of infection (21). The actual sensitivity values were close, due to the small sample set, and predicting which test would be more accurate would be difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to selection techniques, such as the use of pigs 2 to 3 months of age, which are susceptible to infection with B. suis but have very limited ability to produce antibody (16). There may also be a lack of antibody response in the very early stages of infection, or seronegative animals may have been infected without exhibiting any serological or clinical evidence of infection (21). The actual sensitivity values were close, due to the small sample set, and predicting which test would be more accurate would be difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2-ME test is not included in the Office International des Epizooties manual. A general problem with all conventional tests and some primary binding assays is that they detect antibody resulting from exposure to cross-reacting organisms, such as Y. enterocolitica O:9, a problem in some areas (4,21). This is demonstrated by data found at the Statens Veterinaere Serumlaboratorium, Copenhagen, Denmark, website (http:// www.svs.dk/dk/ye-rapp.htm) showing that the complement fixation test does not distinguish between antibodies produced by Y. enterocolitica O:9 and antibodies produced by B. suis or B. abortus in 70% of the sera tested while the CELISA was positive in only 14% of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the assay, they can be relatively easy to perform (STA) or more labor intensive (RIV). Sensitivities are variable (as low as 21% in RBT), however, specificities are usually quite high (96.8–99.3%) [9496]. …”
Section: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu durum ELİsA testinin Bruceıla antikorlarını saptamada SAT'a göre daha duyarlı olduğunuda belirtmekte ve bu bulgular diğer araştırıcılara ait bulgularla da uygunluk göstermiştir (7,9,18,23,27,36,37).…”
Section: Tartışma Ve Sonuçunclassified