2012
DOI: 10.15373/22778179/july2014/121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Early Versus Interval Cholecystectomy in a Case of Acute Cholecystitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the subgroups comparing early and elective groups had a slightly increased risk of infections in the early group (OR 1.33 and 1.11); however, this result was not statistically significant (p = 0.69 and p = 0.80). The other two subgroups showed a statistically significant halving of wound infections in the early group ( [31,32,38,54,67,80,92,95]. 187/817 (22.9 %) patients in the delayed group represented to hospital after successful non-operative management with another acute presentation related to …”
Section: Primary Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the subgroups comparing early and elective groups had a slightly increased risk of infections in the early group (OR 1.33 and 1.11); however, this result was not statistically significant (p = 0.69 and p = 0.80). The other two subgroups showed a statistically significant halving of wound infections in the early group ( [31,32,38,54,67,80,92,95]. 187/817 (22.9 %) patients in the delayed group represented to hospital after successful non-operative management with another acute presentation related to …”
Section: Primary Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%