2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of droplet impact dynamics on a dual-scaled superhydrophobic surface and lotus leaf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

10
149
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
149
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13][14] Artificial superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs) with contact angles larger than 150°are extremely low-energy surfaces that facilitate rapid drop bounce off due to the low friction between the drop and the substrate. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The drops retain a circular symmetry during the first inertial-driven spreading stage and the second capillary-controlled recoiling phase. In addition, the contact time (τ o ⩾ 2.2 rR 3 =g ð Þ 1=2 ) is independent of the impact speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] Artificial superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs) with contact angles larger than 150°are extremely low-energy surfaces that facilitate rapid drop bounce off due to the low friction between the drop and the substrate. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The drops retain a circular symmetry during the first inertial-driven spreading stage and the second capillary-controlled recoiling phase. In addition, the contact time (τ o ⩾ 2.2 rR 3 =g ð Þ 1=2 ) is independent of the impact speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This We 0 approximation is in fact similar to that observed on a CNT-coated micropatterned silicon surface where it was found that We 0 = 0.1. 15 It has been hypothesised that partial pinning phenomenon in the high We regime occurs when the Laplace pressure (P L ) of the deformed liquid-vapor interface is higher than the dynamic pressure (P D ) of the impinging water droplet, but at the same time smaller than the effective water hammer pressure (P WH ) of the impinging water droplet P WH > P L > P D . 26-27 \ 15, 28 The…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is something connected with contact angle hysteresis [9][10][11], in which the contact angle can vary within a range without moving of contact line, i.e. the contact line is pinned on the edge of the pillars [10][11][12] Generally speaking, the contact angle hysteresis (or roll-off angle), Â H , can be obtained by a simple experiment [10,15] (see Fig. 1c): if liquid is steadily added or removed from a droplet by a syringe, initially the contact line keeps static and the contact angle increases or decreases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%