2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8020159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Cross-Product NDVI Dynamics in the Kilimanjaro Region—A Matter of Sensor, Degradation Calibration, and Significance

Abstract: While satellite-based monitoring of vegetation activity at the earth's surface is of vital importance for many eco-climatological applications, the degree of agreement among certain sensors and products providing estimates of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) has been found to vary considerably. In order to assess the extent of such differences in highly heterogeneous terrain, we analyze and compare intra-annual seasonal fluctuations and long-term monotonic trends (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [17] also reported that the annual NDVI from Terra C6 showed larger greening vegetation area than Terra C5 at global scale, which was consistent with the result of our study. Besides, in a comparative study of cross-product NDVI dynamics in a tropical region in Tanzania, significant increasing trends in NDVI also became more apparent in Terra C6 NDVI than C5 NDVI [20]. In this study, the regional average GSNDVI C6 was significantly lower than GSNDVI C5 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhang et al [17] also reported that the annual NDVI from Terra C6 showed larger greening vegetation area than Terra C5 at global scale, which was consistent with the result of our study. Besides, in a comparative study of cross-product NDVI dynamics in a tropical region in Tanzania, significant increasing trends in NDVI also became more apparent in Terra C6 NDVI than C5 NDVI [20]. In this study, the regional average GSNDVI C6 was significantly lower than GSNDVI C5 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The differences between MODIS C5 and C6 NDVI have been evaluated in some previous studies (e.g., [17,20]). However, no study has conducted a comparative analysis of the performance of MODIS C5 and C6 NDVI in monitoring vegetation phenology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of NDVI were calculated from a MODIS Aqua product MYD13Q1 with a horizontal resolution of 250 m by 250 m by averaging corrected NDVI measured of 10 consecutive years (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012) and extracting pixel values corresponding to the geographical positions of the study sites. For details, see Detsch, Otte, Appelhans, and Nauss (2016) and Peters et al (2016Peters et al ( , 2019).…”
Section: Study Sites and Environmental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Collection 6 Terra MODIS monthly product MOD13C2 with a spatial resolution of 0.05°(about 5.5 km at equator) and covering from 2000 to present (Didan, 2015). The surface reflectance bands have been corrected for atmospheric effects (Vermote & Kotchenova, 2008) and sensor degradation (Lyapustin et al, 2014;Detsch et al, 2016). To match the spatial resolution of VOD data, the red and near-infrared reflectance bands were aggregated to 0.25°by averaging before the calculation of NDVI.…”
Section: Ndvi and Vod Datamentioning
confidence: 99%