2014
DOI: 10.4103/0975-2870.144864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of conventional incision and drainage versus incision and drainage with primary closure of the wound in acute abscesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In present study no recurrence is seen in the experiment group and there was one case of recurrence out of 25 cases (4%) in control group. Similar findings were observed in study by Anirrudha K where recurrence was three times more in cases of conventional incision and drainage as compared to primary closure [5] . Similar findings were observed in the study by Khanna et al [9] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In present study no recurrence is seen in the experiment group and there was one case of recurrence out of 25 cases (4%) in control group. Similar findings were observed in study by Anirrudha K where recurrence was three times more in cases of conventional incision and drainage as compared to primary closure [5] . Similar findings were observed in the study by Khanna et al [9] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This proposed method, termed as primary suction closure is supported by many authors who demonstrated its usefulness in the management of breast abscess. Advantages of closure technique are quick healing rate, less hospital stay, no greater recurrence than the conventional method, better scar formation and finally reduced cost of material and may be recommended as an alternative treatment that is superior to the conventional technique [5] . The present study was taken up to compare the outcomes between conventional incision and drainage and primary suction closure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The mean hospital stay in primary closure group was The other studies also reported the decrease in healing time after primary closures. 10,13,14,15 The healing by primary intention in primarily closed wounds is faster than healing by secondary intention in open wounds. The mean number of post-operative hospital visits was 2.84±1.9 days in primary closure group and 8.72±4.98 days in open group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%