2015
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/25/255102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of CdS:F and CdS:O thin films deposited by reactive RF-sputtering technique for window layer application in solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[41,42] Thus, the BE difference of 456.72 eV in the Al 2p peak located at 74.4 eV and O1s (531.4 eV) is consistent with the presenceo fA l ÀOb onds in the www.chemsuschem.org ence of the S 6 + and S 4 + species showedb yt he S2p 3/2 peaks at higher bindinge nergies (168-169 eV), we can confirmt he formation of as mall amount of CdSO 4 andC dSO 3 on the surface of CdS. [45,46] Thus, the lower peak intensity of Cd 3d and S2pi n the Al 2 O 3 -coated CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod array heterojunction than in the uncoated CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod arrays confirms the Al 2 O 3 layer is presento nt he surface of the CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod array heterojunction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[41,42] Thus, the BE difference of 456.72 eV in the Al 2p peak located at 74.4 eV and O1s (531.4 eV) is consistent with the presenceo fA l ÀOb onds in the www.chemsuschem.org ence of the S 6 + and S 4 + species showedb yt he S2p 3/2 peaks at higher bindinge nergies (168-169 eV), we can confirmt he formation of as mall amount of CdSO 4 andC dSO 3 on the surface of CdS. [45,46] Thus, the lower peak intensity of Cd 3d and S2pi n the Al 2 O 3 -coated CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod array heterojunction than in the uncoated CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod arrays confirms the Al 2 O 3 layer is presento nt he surface of the CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod array heterojunction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The Al 2p peak is located at 74.4 eV;h owever,t he asymmetric O1sp eak at 531.5 eV is relativelyb road and is associatedw ith different types of bonds. [45,46] Thus, the lower peak intensity of Cd 3d and S2pi n the Al 2 O 3 -coated CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod array heterojunction than in the uncoated CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod arrays confirms the Al 2 O 3 layer is presento nt he surface of the CdS/Zr:Fe 2 O 3 nanorod array heterojunction. [41,42] Thus, the BE difference of 456.72 eV in the Al 2p peak located at 74.4 eV and O1s (531.4 eV) is consistent with the presenceo fA l ÀOb onds in the Al 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 8 B, S 2p doublets appear at the binding energies of 161.76 eV (2p 3/2 ) and 162.93 eV (2p 1/2 ), where the dominant 2p 3/2 line agrees well with most of the sulfides, such as Cu x S (161.7 eV; Larson, 1974 ) and SnS x (161.7 eV; Cruz et al., 2003 ), indicating S 2– in the precursor. Besides, we do not observe any XPS peak at the higher binding energy from 172 to 167 eV coming from the oxidized sulfur (S 4+ or S 6+ ) ( Hernández-Rodríguez et al., 2015 , Meysing et al., 2015 , Thomas et al., 1997 ), suggesting that no (SO 3 ) 2– , (SO 4 ) 2– , or (S 2 O 3 ) 2– species is present in the precursor. The high-resolution C 1s spectrum in Figure 8 C shows three visible peaks at the binding energies of 284.63, 286.63, and 288.76 eV, which can be assigned to C–C, C–O, and O–C=O bonds from the tartrate and citrate species, respectively ( Cano et al., 2001 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the case of the CdS NR/CdSe-TDH-4h heterojunction photoanodes, peaks of Cd 3d and S 2p present at 404.87 and 161.18 eV, respectively, were found and are attributed to the Cd 2+ and S 2– species, respectively, in CdS/CdSO 3 . Furthermore, the presence of S 2p 3/2 peaks at higher BEs (168–169 eV) can be attributed to the S 4+ and S 6+ species and confirm the formation of a small amount of CdSO 4 and CdSO 3 on the surface of CdS NR/CdSe-TDH-4h heterojunction photoanodes. This indicates that after the second hydrothermal, the CdSe-TDH-4h heterojunction nanostructure photoanode sample is transformed into CdS NR’s/CdSe-TDH, CdSO 4 , and CdSO 3 . Figure shows the raw resonance Raman spectra of the CdSe­(en) 0.5 hybrid and CdS NR/CdSe-TDH-4h heterojunction photoanodes at an excitation wavelength of 532 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%