2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-1970-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Autoregressive, Autoregressive Moving Average, Gene Expression Programming and Bayesian Networks for Estimating Monthly Streamflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results achieved in the present work (i.e., a much better performance of the hybrid machine learning-time series models compared to the stand-alone machine learning models) are in agreement with the outcomes of previous works [11,12,[39][40][41][42][43][44]. The different hybrid models were developed by the authors via coupling the various machine learning and time series models to estimate the hydrological and meteorological data and reported the higher accuracies of hybrid models than the stand-alone machine learning models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results achieved in the present work (i.e., a much better performance of the hybrid machine learning-time series models compared to the stand-alone machine learning models) are in agreement with the outcomes of previous works [11,12,[39][40][41][42][43][44]. The different hybrid models were developed by the authors via coupling the various machine learning and time series models to estimate the hydrological and meteorological data and reported the higher accuracies of hybrid models than the stand-alone machine learning models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Likewise, Tabari et al (2015) reported better performance of an AI-based model including the MLP using the antecedent ST data for modelling the ST at deeper layers than the surface layers. Furthermore, the results of the current study verify the outcomes of previous studies such as Mehdizadeh (2018b), Mehdizadeh and Kozekalani Sales (2018), Mehdizadeh et al (2017cMehdizadeh et al ( , 2018bMehdizadeh et al ( , 2019, and Fathian et al (2019). The authors developed different types of the hybrid models through hybridization of the different time-series-and AI-based models for improving the modelling efficiency of classical models in modelling hydrological variables.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of the Classical And Hybrid Models supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The ARMA model not only fits the stationary time series accurately, but also reduces the number of parameters. ARMA model and its combination models have been widely used in many different fields, such as prediction [15,16], electricity consumption [17][18][19], hydrological research [20] and so on.…”
Section: Product Seasonal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%