2018
DOI: 10.1111/ors.12343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study for the efficacy of different forms of ozone as a treatment for alveolar osteitis

Abstract: Purpose Dry socket is one of the most common complications following dental extraction. Although blood clot disintegration is known to be the cause of the condition, an agreement is lacking regarding the relative merits of various treatment methods. Despite the fact that ozone is one recommended therapy, the literature is deprived of any comparative study for the different forms of ozone delivery. The aim of the current study therefore was to evaluate the efficacy of different forms of ozone as a treatment for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the current study agree with those of other researches [14][15][16] . However, further studies are needed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the current study agree with those of other researches [14][15][16] . However, further studies are needed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Dry socket is a very common complication follows dental extraction [1] with pain is the most important clinical issue but with a great controversy about the efficacy of its treatment methods [2][3][4][5] . Of these treatment modalities, ozone was utilized in a limited number of researches with promising results [9,13,14] due to capability to deliver oxygen to the ischemic tissues, and therefore, improves the metabolism and the healing and activates the immune system [7][8][9][10][11] . However, researches to compare the efficacy of different forms of ozone to treat DS is not enough [17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation