2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.025
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative optimization and performance analysis of four different electrocoagulation-flotation processes for humic acid removal from aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When treatment time and current density increase, there are also higher production rates of metal ions and their hydroxide flocs as well as gas bubbles. Consequently, the concentration of pollutants decreases faster [20,[72][73][74]. The optimal treatment time and current density needed for efficient removal can be considered as 14.10 mA/cm 2 and 40 min, respectively.…”
Section: Simultaneous Efficacy Of Critical Parameters On the Removal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When treatment time and current density increase, there are also higher production rates of metal ions and their hydroxide flocs as well as gas bubbles. Consequently, the concentration of pollutants decreases faster [20,[72][73][74]. The optimal treatment time and current density needed for efficient removal can be considered as 14.10 mA/cm 2 and 40 min, respectively.…”
Section: Simultaneous Efficacy Of Critical Parameters On the Removal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods like the coagulation process [8], membrane technology [9], adsorption processes [10], and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been employed to remove HSs from the aqueous solution. In AOPs, the hydroxyl radical of OH• as the strongest oxidizing agent is generated, which can degrade both organic and inorganic matters [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics of greywater significantly vary depending on many factors such as point of generation, community demographics, human habits, level of occupation, culture and geographical zone (Eriksson et al 2002;Hasani et al 2019). Moreover, detergents, cosmetics and other chemical products could also contribute to the variation of the quality of greywater and its pollutant content (Eriksson et al 2003; Barzegar et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%