2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative life cycle analysis of low power PV lighting products for rural areas in South East Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, impacts from the kerosene light are mainly fuel related, with the majority of emissions on site (when the product is used). Note that the total impact of the Moonlight is a factor 100 less than that of a kerosene light Although the results seem optimistic for the PV lights, there is reasonable uncertainty regarding some aspects of the inventory (Durlinger, Reinders, & Toxopeus, 2012). Some system components have a relatively large impact and large uncertainty (e.g., battery disposal and the printed circuit board), and therefore have to be researched in more detail.…”
Section: B3 Environmental Impacts and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, impacts from the kerosene light are mainly fuel related, with the majority of emissions on site (when the product is used). Note that the total impact of the Moonlight is a factor 100 less than that of a kerosene light Although the results seem optimistic for the PV lights, there is reasonable uncertainty regarding some aspects of the inventory (Durlinger, Reinders, & Toxopeus, 2012). Some system components have a relatively large impact and large uncertainty (e.g., battery disposal and the printed circuit board), and therefore have to be researched in more detail.…”
Section: B3 Environmental Impacts and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User-centered research and financial viability are also of interest but are less researched [60]. The few publications on environmental and human health impacts of off-grid electrification indicate positive impacts, depending highly on scenarios for the end-of-life management for batteries [61], the lifespan of the products, and the institutional and economic success of the electrification programs [14]. Alstone [62] found energy payback times of off-grid lighting technologies between 20 and 50 days and energy return on investment ratios from 10 to 40.…”
Section: Research Trends For Rural Electrification and Off-grid Energmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, to compare the SHS with the other lighting systems in our analysis, we assume that all available energy is used for lighting. This approach is, amongst others, also used in [23]. The case is hypothetical and did not apply for registration under the CDM.…”
Section: Case: Small-scale Rural Solar Pv Projects Under the Cdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emission reductions At are calculated as the difference between baseline and project emissions by means of life cycle analysis. To this end, we updated the model described by Durlinger in [23] and [27], which is an attributional LCA model. Ecoinvent v2.2 data was used to model the background data [28].…”
Section: Absolute Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Costmentioning
confidence: 99%