1997
DOI: 10.1006/cryo.1997.2039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Laboratory Study of Liquid Nitrogen and Argon Gas Cryosurgery Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Argon-based systems have been shown to achieve a more rapid rate of freezing than liquid nitrogenbased systems [23]. Bickels et al [24] hypothesized that the use of a controlled system to deliver the cryogenic substance and the use of a cold-conducting medium would give a more efficient treatment through more precise control of the freezing temperature and duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Argon-based systems have been shown to achieve a more rapid rate of freezing than liquid nitrogenbased systems [23]. Bickels et al [24] hypothesized that the use of a controlled system to deliver the cryogenic substance and the use of a cold-conducting medium would give a more efficient treatment through more precise control of the freezing temperature and duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 To thaw the tissue, high-pressure helium gas, usually at 140-205 bar (2000-3000 psi) was used which generated a temperature of up to 35°C. The gas (argon or helium) fl ows from the highpressure cylinders through the gas delivery and control system, up to the therapeutic probe.…”
Section: Cryoablation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, the liquid nitrogen device reached a lower end temperature than the argon gas device (argon gas: À120°C, liquid nitrogen: À140°C). This is explained by the lower boiling temperature of liquid nitrogen compared to argon gas [8].…”
Section: Ex Vivo Vs In Vivo Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%