2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-015-0679-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative experimental study of image feature detectors and descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For object recognition, BRIEF and SYBA outperformed both SIFT and SURF for high performances value. However, BRIEF and SYBA did not perform well when there is a large viewpoint change, invariance to rotation, and illumination changes [26,27]. In other words, as the descriptor is mostly responsible for improving the feature detector by extracting rotation and illumination invariant descriptors, descriptors such as BRIEF and SYBA that are truly disassociated with any detector would be unable to enhance the capabilities of the detectors, thereby SURF outperformed both BRIEF and SYBA algorithms for high recall values used with orientation and illumination changes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For object recognition, BRIEF and SYBA outperformed both SIFT and SURF for high performances value. However, BRIEF and SYBA did not perform well when there is a large viewpoint change, invariance to rotation, and illumination changes [26,27]. In other words, as the descriptor is mostly responsible for improving the feature detector by extracting rotation and illumination invariant descriptors, descriptors such as BRIEF and SYBA that are truly disassociated with any detector would be unable to enhance the capabilities of the detectors, thereby SURF outperformed both BRIEF and SYBA algorithms for high recall values used with orientation and illumination changes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The BRIEF and SYBA descriptors are binary descriptors that consist of a binary string including the results of intensity comparison at random pre-determined pixel locations. These two descriptor methods employ faster feature detectors and provide lowering descriptor size than SIFT and SURF [26,27]. For object recognition, BRIEF and SYBA outperformed both SIFT and SURF for high performances value.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a place for faster and more robust techniques, able to successfully describe and match images despite various transformations, distortions, or illumination conditions [6,12,24,25].…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the quality of feature extractors, a key paper of Mikolajczyk and Schmid [2] introduced a methodology for evaluation of feature invariance to image scale, rotation, exposure and camera viewpoint changes. Mukherjee et al [3] evaluated a wide range of image feature detectors and descriptors, confirming the superior performance of the SIFT algorithm [4]. Other comparisons were aimed at the quality of features for visual odometry [5] or visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%