2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2016.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image features for visual teach-and-repeat navigation in changing environments

Abstract: We present an evaluation of standard image features in the context of long-term visual teach-and-repeat navigation of mobile robots, where the environment exhibits significant changes in appearance caused by seasonal weather variations and daily illumination changes. We argue that for long-term autonomous navigation, the viewpoint-, scaleand rotation-invariance of the standard feature extractors is less important than their robustness to the mid-and longterm environment appearance changes. Therefore, we focus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, larger data-sets such as, [5] (covering a campus scenario over the course of 15 months) and [30] (obtained via a train) have been collected. Krajník et al [10] proposed and tested a descriptor which copes well with seasonal changes. This was evaluated on outdoor images and compared against other descriptors, over the course of a year.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, larger data-sets such as, [5] (covering a campus scenario over the course of 15 months) and [30] (obtained via a train) have been collected. Krajník et al [10] proposed and tested a descriptor which copes well with seasonal changes. This was evaluated on outdoor images and compared against other descriptors, over the course of a year.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After one week, the robot visited the same locations every 10 minutes for one day, collecting 1152 time-stamped images used for testing. The training set images were then processed by the BRIEF method [38], which shows good robustness to appearance changes [39]. The extracted features belonging to the same locations were matched and we obtained their visibility over time, which was then processed by the temporal models evaluated.…”
Section: B Topological Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to that, our map-tracking algorithm employs a pose prior and performs a local search in the image space. This variation in methodology leads to differing results as compared to [41]. Average number of observed landmarks (top), localization recall (middle), and translation accuracy on the NCLT datasets (left), and UP-Drive datasets (right).…”
Section: E Binary Descriptor Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%