2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22233-7_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Evaluation of JavaScript Execution Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of iterative constructs also could suggest that traditional JIT like optimization could be less effective for web applications than for the established benchmarks. The results in [36] show that just-in-time compilation often increases the execution time for many common web applications. However, we still need to be careful with our conclusions, and we will outline a couple of reasons why such a care is needed.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The lack of iterative constructs also could suggest that traditional JIT like optimization could be less effective for web applications than for the established benchmarks. The results in [36] show that just-in-time compilation often increases the execution time for many common web applications. However, we still need to be careful with our conclusions, and we will outline a couple of reasons why such a care is needed.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be understood from the characteristics of JavaScript execution shown by Martisen at al. [4]; JavaScript functions are small in terms of number of executed bytecode instructions and quickly returns. Therefore the depth of the speculated functions is going to vary.…”
Section: B Fixed Checkpoint Depth Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Google's JavaScript engine V8's decrease in execution time has been measured on a set of benchmarks, which Ratanaworabhan et al [3] show are unrepresentative for real-world web applications. Martinsen et al [4] show the dramatic effect of this as JIT speeds up the execution of benchmarks, but often slows down the execution time in popular web applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However we measured the JavaScript workload for a large number of popular Web Applications, with in-depth measurements for so-called social networks [4], and we found that certain JavaScript features play an important role in real-life Web Applications [4], [7].…”
Section: A Unrepresentative Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increased popularity of Web Applications and a higher demand for performance, several optimization techniques have been suggested along with a set of benchmarks. Several studies have shown that these benchmarks are unrepresentative [4], [5], [6], and that current optimization techniques often degrades the performance of Web Applications [7]. Therefore alternative optimization techniques and multicore architectures should play a crucial part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%