A comparative analysis on digital libraries and academic search engines from the dual-route perspective

Abstract

Purpose Digital libraries and academic search engines have developed as two important online scholarly information sources with different features. The purpose of this study is to compare digital libraries and academic search engines from the perspective of the dual-route model. Design/methodology/approach Research hypotheses were developed. Potential participants were recruited to answer an online survey distributing at Chinese social media out of which 251 responses were deemed to be valid and used for data analysis. The paired samples t-test was used to compare the means. Findings Both information quality (central route) and source credibility (peripheral route) of digital libraries are significantly higher than those of academic search engines, while there is no significant difference between digital libraries and academic search engines in terms of affinity (peripheral route). Practical implications In the digital information society, the important status of digital libraries as conventional information sources should be spread by necessary measures. Academic search engines can act as complementary online information sources for seeking academic information rather than the substitute for digital libraries. Practitioners of digital libraries should value the complementary role of academic search engines and encourage users to use academic search engines while emphasizing the importance of digital libraries as conventional information sources. Originality/value According to the dual-route model, this study compares digital libraries and academic search engines in terms of information quality, source credibility and affinity, which the authors believe presents a new lens for digital libraries research and practice alike.

Key features of digital library management system (DLMS) for developing digital libraries: An investigation from LIS practitioners in Pakistan

“…Esmaeili et al (2021) conducted a study on the roadmap of Iranian digital academic libraries in the context of cloud infrastructure and the development of cloud libraries. Cao et al (2021) investigated the role of digital libraries and academic search engines to support the educational mission of the institutions. The study revealed that modern age users frequently utilized digital information resources to make completion of the assigned educational and research-based tasks.…”

Functionalities of FRBR-Based Information Visualisation in Library Bibliographic Records

“…Haji Zeinolabedini (2017), Salaba et al (2018), Possemato (2018), Tallerås et al (2018), Aalberg (2019), Beene et al (2020), Cao et al (2021), Chen (2023). To identify and analyse the challenges associated with FRBR implementation.…”

“…They provide students with visual and textual materials to analyse and evaluate, fostering discussions about authority, authorship, bias, audience, and inclusion/exclusion. On top of that, easier cataloguing and circulation for librarians are stated by Cao et al (2021) within the paper. FRBR promotes a user-centric approach to information retrieval by focusing on the user's tasks and goals.…”

Automatic spelling error detection and correction for Tigrigna information retrieval: a hybrid approach

“…The rapid increase in the size of web information has introduced new challenges for search engines in the manner in which they retrieve search results. In reality, there are still many situations in which users are presented with inaccurate or very poor search results [3].…”