2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2017.7989022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of tightly-coupled monocular, binocular, and stereo VINS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All three solutions are optimization-based approaches requiring powerful CPUs to operate in real time. More recently, Paul et al [27] proposed a filter-based stereo VIO based on the square root inverse filter [18], which demonstrates the possibility of operating a stereo VIO online efficiently, even on a mobile device. Since the implementations of [16] and [18] are not open-sourced, they are not used for comparison in this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three solutions are optimization-based approaches requiring powerful CPUs to operate in real time. More recently, Paul et al [27] proposed a filter-based stereo VIO based on the square root inverse filter [18], which demonstrates the possibility of operating a stereo VIO online efficiently, even on a mobile device. Since the implementations of [16] and [18] are not open-sourced, they are not used for comparison in this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of other approaches to visual-inertial odometry have been proposed [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], but these do not offer publicly-available implementations. All of these are evaluated on some of the EuRoC datasets, but none contain a comprehensive comparison to other algorithms.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While SLAM estimators -by jointly estimating the location of the sensor platform and the features in the surrounding environment -are able to easily incorporate loop closure constraints to bound localization errors and have attracted much research attention in the past three decades [8,1,6,3], there are also significant research efforts devoted to open-loop VIO systems (e.g., [30,13,14,22,17,50,37,49,53,5,2,15,40]). For example, a hybrid MSCKF/SLAM estimator was developed for VIO [23], which retains features that can be continuously tracked beyond the sliding window in the state as SLAM features while removing them when they get lost.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This localization solution has the advantages of being both cheap and ubiquitous, and has the potential to provide position and orientation (pose) estimates which are on-par in terms of accuracy with more expensive sensors such as LiDAR. To date, various algorithms are available for VINS problems including visual-inertial (VI)-SLAM [19,45] and visual-inertial odometry (VIO) [30,29,22], such as the extended Kalman filter (EKF) [30,20,14,22,17,16,50,37], unscented Kalman filter (UKF) [10,4], and batch or slidingwindow optimization methods [46,18,21,33,52,45,40], among which the EKF-based approaches remain arguably the most popular for resource constrained devices because of their efficiency. While current approaches can perform well over a short period of time in a small-scale environment (e.g., see [13,22,15]), they are not robust and accurate enough for long-term, large-scale deployments in challenging environments, due to their limited available resources of sensing, memory and computation, which, if not properly addressed, often result in short mission duration or intractable real-time estimator performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%