2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of the outcomes of aortic cuffs and converters for endovascular graft migration

Abstract: Proximal attachment failure and graft migration are potentially lethal complications of EVAR. Proximal graft extension using an aortic cuff is the easiest technique for salvaging an endovascular graft. Unfortunately, it has a predictable failure mode (development of a type III endoleak due to component separation) and is associated with a significantly higher failure rate than with the use of a converter. EVAR salvage with a converter and a femorofemoral bypass is a more complex but superior option for endovas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although endostaples prevented complications requiring open reinterventions that would be a more expensive solution, the double endovascular procedure we needed in our case is certainly not costeffective. In general the use of only proximal extension for distal migration of a stent-graft in hostile anatomy is associated with a significantly higher failure (11,12). Fixation of the stent-graft with endostaples can prevent this migration being eventually a less invasive and less expensive long-term solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although endostaples prevented complications requiring open reinterventions that would be a more expensive solution, the double endovascular procedure we needed in our case is certainly not costeffective. In general the use of only proximal extension for distal migration of a stent-graft in hostile anatomy is associated with a significantly higher failure (11,12). Fixation of the stent-graft with endostaples can prevent this migration being eventually a less invasive and less expensive long-term solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 A previous report of the short-term data from this registry suggested that the converter configuration was the better reconstructive option compared with the main body extension. 10 While the comparison between the two configurations was not repeated during this study, further analyzes are pending to evaluate this variable, as well as other factors, as follow-up for patients in this registry is ongoing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional details regarding the IFU as well as the device description have previously been reported (Appendix, online only). 10 Implantation procedure. Before implantation, all cases were reviewed by a member of the physician review committee to ensure anatomic suitability and that patients met the IFU for the device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] The design of contemporary endografts involves specific mechanisms to help accomplish and maintain adequate fixation, such as columnar strength provided by the design of the stent-graft body; suprarenal bare stents incorporating into the aortic wall; suprarenal or infrarenal barbs, pins, hooks, or anchors; or even endostaples or endoanchors. 4,[9][10][11] Enhancing the proximal seal of the device, rather than just fixation, is another means of preventing proximal endoleak and migration; few manufacturers have addressed this in their device design to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%