2016 IEEE East-West Design &Amp; Test Symposium (EWDTS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ewdts.2016.7807636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of mutation testing tools for Java

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Henry Coles et.al [10] is the description of the PIT the mutation testing tool by presenting that PIT is a mutation testing tool for Java which is robust, scalable, and fast and is well integrated with Ant and Maven and is an open source which is actively maintained. Forostyanova Mariya et.al [11] with its comparison between µJava and Pitest it tells us that Pitest generates less number of mutants and helps in avoiding the generation of equivalent mutators. Zainab Nayyar et.al [12] paper tells us that Mutation testing is helpful for verification and validation of the requirements.…”
Section: Background Of the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henry Coles et.al [10] is the description of the PIT the mutation testing tool by presenting that PIT is a mutation testing tool for Java which is robust, scalable, and fast and is well integrated with Ant and Maven and is an open source which is actively maintained. Forostyanova Mariya et.al [11] with its comparison between µJava and Pitest it tells us that Pitest generates less number of mutants and helps in avoiding the generation of equivalent mutators. Zainab Nayyar et.al [12] paper tells us that Mutation testing is helpful for verification and validation of the requirements.…”
Section: Background Of the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%