2022
DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2022.2044139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of modeling approaches and canopy height-based data sources for mapping forest growing stock volume in a northern subtropical ecosystem of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LASSO uses constraint forms to identify smaller subsets of estimated variance and predictor variables with good variable selection and regularization capabilities [103]. The results show that optimal results were obtained for the LASSO variable set, which indicates that LASSO is a more efficient variable selection method [62,104].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LASSO uses constraint forms to identify smaller subsets of estimated variance and predictor variables with good variable selection and regularization capabilities [103]. The results show that optimal results were obtained for the LASSO variable set, which indicates that LASSO is a more efficient variable selection method [62,104].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…LASSO is a regression method that performs both regularization and variable selection to improve the prediction accuracy and enhance the interpretability of the model. It removes the coefficients of some ineffective variables from the model by making them smaller or even compressing them to 0 to deal with multi-collinearity and retains only the most useful features [62].…”
Section: Variable Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These unique LiDAR properties make it more attractive than other high-resolution sensors for challenging forest stands [26][27][28]. For modeling forest properties, variables are typically extracted from airborne LiDAR data using two common methods [29]: (a) extracting height metrics, density metrics, and forest profile features directly from point clouds [30][31][32][33] and (b) extracting statistics from canopy height model (CHM) data, which is the distinction between a digital surface model (DSM) and a digital terrain model (DTM) derived from LIDAR data [34,35]. Despite these contributions, LiDAR data are cost-prohibitive, thus limiting its use in nations with limited resources.…”
Section: Historical Research Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, remote sensing technology has been widely applied in forest surveys across large areas, and a variety of remotely sensed data including optical, Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4410 2 of 14 radar, and Lidar with different modeling approaches from simple linear regression to complicated deep learning have been used to estimate forest attributes [2][3][4][5][6]. No matter what remotely sensed data or algorithms are used, sample plot data aggregated from single trees are required for both model development and model validation [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No matter what remotely sensed data or algorithms are used, sample plot data aggregated from single trees are required for both model development and model validation [7]. By building relationships between remote sensing-derived variables and forest attributes of in situ plots, the continuous distribution of the forest attributes in a study area can be predicted [6,8]. Therefore, accurate measurements of sample plots are crucial for both traditional forest inventories and remote sensing-based modeling approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%