2017
DOI: 10.18535/jmscr/v5i2.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Mean Platelet Volume and Other Platelet Indices in Patient of Acute Myocardial Infarction with Healthy ControlProspective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference in platelet count; however, there was a decreased platelet count in STEMI and NSTEMI compared to UA patients (Table 2). This result was consistent with other 9,24,26 previous studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was no significant difference in platelet count; however, there was a decreased platelet count in STEMI and NSTEMI compared to UA patients (Table 2). This result was consistent with other 9,24,26 previous studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This study also failed to find any significant difference in PCT among three ACS groups. The previous studies conducted by Al-Obeidi et al, Pipliwal et al, and Costa et al also found similar 24,29,30 results with this recent study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Progressive platelet activation even will lead to a change in platelet morphology including spherical transformation, and pseudopodia formation, which will cause platelet size to vary, generating PDW value in myocardial infarction patients higher than in controls. [10][11][12] Similarly, the results of the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was a significant difference in PDW values between STEMI group, NSTEMI, group, UAP group, and the control (p=0.000) as shown in Table 2. The results of the Mann-Whitney test also showed that there were significant differences in PDW of each of STEMI group, NSTEMI group, and UAP group from the control (p=0.000) as demonstrated in Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Page 3431 Similarly as described in table 7, Cameron et al, Martin et al, Martin et al, Pizzulli et al, Khanderkar et al, MP Ranjith et al, Prem shanker pipliwal et al, G. Ranjani et al, and Vitthal Khode compared MPV between IHD patients and control groups and found to have MPV 9.07, 7.3, 10.09±1.43, 9.4±1.23, 10.43±1.03, 10.97±0.58, 11.97±1.458, 9.8±0.86(AMI) -9.5±0.84(UA) and 9.65±0.96 fl respectively, which are significantly higher in as compared to control groups [13][14][15][16][17]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%