2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compact explicit DC model for short channel Gate-All-Around junctionless MOSFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression of drain current is free of any fitting parameters and can be evaluated based on the physical device parameters such as that of geometry and doping. Additionally, short channel effects were also taken into account considering velocity saturation, an effective mobility, µeff, and incorporating an effective gate length, Leff=L-ΔL, where L is the physical device gate length and ΔL is calculated following [9], (4) With, vsat being the saturation velocity and S being a parameter ensuring that ΔL tends to zero below the threshold, defined as [9], (5) Where QDP0+QC0 is the total mobile charge at the source, given by the long channel expression and B is a smoothing parameter. Furthermore, the short channel corrections incorporates an effective drain voltage, Vdeff, through (4) that reaches its maximum at VSAT, the saturation voltage [9], (6) Here, A2 is another smoothing parameter for the transition of the drain voltage to VSAT.…”
Section: Compact Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The expression of drain current is free of any fitting parameters and can be evaluated based on the physical device parameters such as that of geometry and doping. Additionally, short channel effects were also taken into account considering velocity saturation, an effective mobility, µeff, and incorporating an effective gate length, Leff=L-ΔL, where L is the physical device gate length and ΔL is calculated following [9], (4) With, vsat being the saturation velocity and S being a parameter ensuring that ΔL tends to zero below the threshold, defined as [9], (5) Where QDP0+QC0 is the total mobile charge at the source, given by the long channel expression and B is a smoothing parameter. Furthermore, the short channel corrections incorporates an effective drain voltage, Vdeff, through (4) that reaches its maximum at VSAT, the saturation voltage [9], (6) Here, A2 is another smoothing parameter for the transition of the drain voltage to VSAT.…”
Section: Compact Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, short channel effects were also taken into account considering velocity saturation, an effective mobility, µeff, and incorporating an effective gate length, Leff=L-ΔL, where L is the physical device gate length and ΔL is calculated following [9], (4) With, vsat being the saturation velocity and S being a parameter ensuring that ΔL tends to zero below the threshold, defined as [9], (5) Where QDP0+QC0 is the total mobile charge at the source, given by the long channel expression and B is a smoothing parameter. Furthermore, the short channel corrections incorporates an effective drain voltage, Vdeff, through (4) that reaches its maximum at VSAT, the saturation voltage [9], (6) Here, A2 is another smoothing parameter for the transition of the drain voltage to VSAT. Considering that the source and drain access region resistances degrade the drain current above threshold, the final expression of the drain current can be written as a function of the long channel current (IDS,0), using (3), taking into account the corrections due to short-channel effects described by equations ( 4)-( 6), as follows [9], (7) Here, RS and RD are the source and drain series access resistances, respectively; NF is the number of nanowires in parallel, η1 is a fine tuning parameter to take into account the drain-voltage dependence of the series access resistances and QDP,Vdeff+QC,Vdeff is the total mobile charge at the drain end (pinch-off) of the channel.…”
Section: Compact Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, due to high channel doping the mobility reduces due to ionization scattering and subsequently results in lower transconductance [6] [7] . To overcome these challenges, many authors have introducing solutions such as junctionless nanowire transistor with a dual material gate [8] , dual material gate junctionless transistor with high-k spacer [9] , dual material gate silicon on nothing junctionless transistor [10] , dual material double gate junctionless transistor considering fringing field [11] , charge plasma based transistor with induced graded channel [12] , gate-all-around junctionless transistor [13] , non-uniformly doped symmetric double gate junctionless transistor [14] , have been proposed. Among these junctionless transistor and architecture, dual material double gate junctionless transistor is best candidate for CMOS logic circuits [15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%