2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined model–observation approach to estimate historic gridded fields of PM2.5 mass and species concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimated exposures offer improvements over those drawn from the CSN for similar analyses of PM-associated morbidity and mortality, although one concern is whether the combined CMAQ/observation approach accurately reflects outdoor species concentrations, particularly for SO 4 concentrations during the summer and fall, when they tend to be overestimated (Hogrefe et al, 2009). However, as noted, the simulated data used for these analyses have already been subject to a partial validity assessment and are corrected to address known over/ underestimation of particular species by season (Hogrefe et al, 2009). We also identified small but significant associations with SO 4 during the winter months, when CMAQ generally underestimates these concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our estimated exposures offer improvements over those drawn from the CSN for similar analyses of PM-associated morbidity and mortality, although one concern is whether the combined CMAQ/observation approach accurately reflects outdoor species concentrations, particularly for SO 4 concentrations during the summer and fall, when they tend to be overestimated (Hogrefe et al, 2009). However, as noted, the simulated data used for these analyses have already been subject to a partial validity assessment and are corrected to address known over/ underestimation of particular species by season (Hogrefe et al, 2009). We also identified small but significant associations with SO 4 during the winter months, when CMAQ generally underestimates these concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Specifically, these data were estimated by bias-correcting CMAQ concentrations provided on a 12 km by 12 km modeling grid with available CSN measurements, assuming seasonally varying species-specific biases (Hogrefe et al, 2009). The chemical species of interest included components that make up the largest fractions of PM 2.5 total mass: secondary aerosols sulfate (SO 4 ), ammonium (NH 4 ), and nitrate (NO 3 ), elemental carbon (EC), the carbon-only portion of the organic carbon aerosol (OC), and crustal/other PM 2.5 , including non-carbon organic matter (OTH).…”
Section: Pollutant and Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uncertainties also exist due to the 15 assumption of equal toxicity for different components of PM2.5 (Li et al, 2015). For our analysis, we use modeled air pollutant concentration without any bias-correction based on either in-situ observation or satellite data Hogrefe et al, 2009;van Donkelaar et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2016). In our study, the PM2.5 mortality burdens trend may be overestimated, and O3 mortality burdens underestimated, based on comparing the modeled air pollution trends with the observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, county-level and gridded emission inventories are available; spatial interpolations that use such supplementary information potentially provide added resolution. Air quality model predictions 23 and, for recent years, satellite data 59 -62 could also be combined with the monitoring data to increase the spatial resolution of PM 2.5 concentration fields.…”
Section: Spatial Variations Of Fine Mass Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%