2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3183067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Combined Modal Correlation Criterion for Structural Damage Identification with Noisy Modal Data

Abstract: Structural damage identification is a scientific field that has attracted a lot of interest in the scientific community during the recent years. There have been many studies intending to find a reliable method to identify damage in structural elements both in location and extent. Most damage identification methods are based on the changes of dynamic characteristics and static responses, but the incompleteness of the test data is a great obstacle for both. In this paper, a structural damage identification metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direct correlation between the modes is also underlined by Table 3 that depicts the Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) 21 calculated between the mode shapes obtained from the displacement and acceleration analysis. This parameter represents a measure of the degree of correlation between two mode shapes: MAC values close to 0 indicate that two modes present different shapes and values higher than 0.7 indicate good correlation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The direct correlation between the modes is also underlined by Table 3 that depicts the Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) 21 calculated between the mode shapes obtained from the displacement and acceleration analysis. This parameter represents a measure of the degree of correlation between two mode shapes: MAC values close to 0 indicate that two modes present different shapes and values higher than 0.7 indicate good correlation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the environmental factors such as temperature variation and random noise effects are both considered. e temperature variation can be simulated according to equation ( 4), and the random noise can be simulated as follows [37]:…”
Section: Damage Identification Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical stiffness of the bearings is 1.0 × 10 6 KN/m. The damage of structural elements and bearings are both simulated using reduction of stiffness [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Five damage cases are introduced, which are shown in Table 5 .…”
Section: Damage Detection Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%