2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20195488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bearing Damage Detection of a Reinforced Concrete Plate Based on Sensitivity Analysis and Chaotic Moth-Flame-Invasive Weed Optimization

Abstract: This article proposes a novel damage detection method based on the sensitivity analysis and chaotic moth-flame-invasive weed optimization (CMF-IWO), which is utilized to simultaneously identify the damage of structural elements and bearings. First, the sensitivity coefficients of eigenvalues to the damage factors of structural elements and bearings are deduced, the regularization technology is used to solve the problem of equation undetermined, meanwhile, the modal strain energy-based index is utilized to dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aiming to every damage case, the modal test number is 50, and the first five-order natural frequencies and modal shapes are adopted; and the iterative number is determined as 5000 for case 1 and 10,000 for cases 2-7. Meanwhile, another method in the paper [13] is also adopted to make a comparison, namely, the identification method using optimization algorithm and sensitivity analysis (OASA), which can make a comparison with the proposed method. As far as OASA is concerned, herein, some parameters of CMF-IWO algorithm except for the iterative number and population size are the same as in [13].…”
Section: Damage Identification and Results' Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Aiming to every damage case, the modal test number is 50, and the first five-order natural frequencies and modal shapes are adopted; and the iterative number is determined as 5000 for case 1 and 10,000 for cases 2-7. Meanwhile, another method in the paper [13] is also adopted to make a comparison, namely, the identification method using optimization algorithm and sensitivity analysis (OASA), which can make a comparison with the proposed method. As far as OASA is concerned, herein, some parameters of CMF-IWO algorithm except for the iterative number and population size are the same as in [13].…”
Section: Damage Identification and Results' Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K s means the global stiffness matrix of a structure; nele denotes the total number of structural elements; and k e i and θ i are i-th element stiffness matrix and i-th stiffness reduction factor, respectively. Meanwhile, the boundary condition change, namely, the damage of bearings, can be represented as the boundary condition matrix, and it can be defined as follows [13,30]:…”
Section: Structural Dynamic Characteristic Equation Consideringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The optimization effectiveness of the hybrid algorithm was tested and verified via five benchmark functions and damage identification numerical example of a simply supported beam. The results revealed its excellent global search ability and better convergence effectiveness [52].…”
Section: Rosenbrockmentioning
confidence: 99%