2011
DOI: 10.1556/ageod.46.2011.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined global Moho model based on seismic and gravimetric data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since proper spherical model equations can be quite easily derived and linearized [see e.g. Eshagh et al 2011], global applications of the collocation method seem to be feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since proper spherical model equations can be quite easily derived and linearized [see e.g. Eshagh et al 2011], global applications of the collocation method seem to be feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, satellite dedicated gravity missions [Reigber et al 1999, Albertella et al 2002, Tapley et al 2004] have made available a large amount of data that can be profitably used in combination with ground based gravity data [Shin et al 2007]. Recently, an approach based on the integration of gravity and seismic information has been proposed by Eshagh et al [2011]. They devised a method based on a stochastic combination of seismic and gravity Moho models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the advent of satellite dedicated gravity missions (Reigber et al, 1999;Tapley et al, 2004;Floberghagen et al, 2011), made possible to estimate the Moho depth at global scale. Eshagh et al (2011) and Reguzzoni et al (2013) proposed methods that optimally combine seismic and gravimetric data for Moho estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was later proceeded by some additional theoretical studies for recoverying also the Moho density contrast (MDC) (Sjöberg and Bagherbandi, 2011) and improved for isolating the Bouguer gravity anomaly from non-isostatic effects (Bagherbandi and Sjöberg, 2012). Eshagh et al (2011) presented a Moho model from a combination of the EGM2008 and seismic model based on the VMM method. Wang et al (2011) released gravity-derived crustal thickness models for the North Atlantic Ocean and the Chain Fracture Zone, which are calibrated using seismically determined crustal thickness, and he concluded that about 7% of the ocean crust is less than 4 km thick, 58% is 47 km thick, and the remaining 35% is more than 7 km thick.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%