2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A collision avoidance model for two-pedestrian groups: Considering random avoidance patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They conclude that group size, intra-group structures, and inter-group relationships are important in crowd evacuation. Zhou et al 43 propose an agent-based model to simulate the group behavior of two different groups by providing collision avoidance. They use a velocity-obstacle method to simulate the locomotion of the crowd.…”
Section: Dossetti Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that group size, intra-group structures, and inter-group relationships are important in crowd evacuation. Zhou et al 43 propose an agent-based model to simulate the group behavior of two different groups by providing collision avoidance. They use a velocity-obstacle method to simulate the locomotion of the crowd.…”
Section: Dossetti Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the methods in the study of Zhou et al . [31] and Zhang et al . [32] are adopted to build the utility function.…”
Section: Vehicle–pedestrian Collision Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the essential tasks of evacuation in a building is to represent the inherent link between facilities layout and human behavior [34,35]. e pedestrians' path finding behaviors in buildings and channels have been mainly focused on [36,37], and the behavior differences in path finding regarding the dynamic spatial availability have been considered [38,39]. Rogsch et al considered the difference in spatial knowledge of people in the building and analyzed the evacuation efficiency [12,40].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%