2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A collaborative energy sharing optimization model among electric vehicle charging stations, commercial buildings, and power grid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical day is chosen to support the details of the research, the period of MPC based scheduling is 24 h and ∆ t is 1 h. The office arrival time of EVs owners is represented by a normal distribution with mean value 9:00 a.m. and standard deviation 1 h; and the office departure time follows a normal distribution with mean value 6:00 p.m. and standard deviation 1 h. The scenarios of the available number of EVs at each time are generated by scenarios generation and reduction technique. It is assumed that the thermal power demand is completely dependent on the CHP units without additional equipment [41,42]. The capacity of each EV is assumed to be 48 kWh, and the total number of available EVs is 100 in this case.…”
Section: Case 1: Mes In Office Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical day is chosen to support the details of the research, the period of MPC based scheduling is 24 h and ∆ t is 1 h. The office arrival time of EVs owners is represented by a normal distribution with mean value 9:00 a.m. and standard deviation 1 h; and the office departure time follows a normal distribution with mean value 6:00 p.m. and standard deviation 1 h. The scenarios of the available number of EVs at each time are generated by scenarios generation and reduction technique. It is assumed that the thermal power demand is completely dependent on the CHP units without additional equipment [41,42]. The capacity of each EV is assumed to be 48 kWh, and the total number of available EVs is 100 in this case.…”
Section: Case 1: Mes In Office Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced rate of the cooling and heating loads caused by changes to the design of building envelopes was analyzed and the results were used to estimate approximate reductions in GHG emissions. Similarly, energy savings in buildings with energy efficiency systems [50][51][52][53] (i.e., microgrid with renewable energy exchange, efficient power sharing within energy districts, robust energy scheduling, energy storage for communities, renewable energy technologies), energy sharing technologies [54][55][56], and zero-energy building technology [57] cannot be analyzed by the method proposed in this study. In other words, energy consumption with respect to energy efficiency and energy sharing, including HVAC system and plant equipment cannot be analyzed.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a key condition to implement such schemes is the idle time a vehicle remains attached to a plug, which makes sense at office buildings [9] or at home. A typical example was proposed by Quddus et al [10] with a sector coupling scheme between vehicles, charging stations, and commercial buildings, with hourly operational decisions for energy flows, but it does not address the minute-scale power peak issues of ultra-fast charging stations. From a CSO perspective, the first issues to solve are grid connection requirements and demand charges, rather than grid services such as frequency regulation, which can be implemented in a later stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%