2015
DOI: 10.1108/s0742-332220150000033025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cognitive Mapping Approach to Business Models: Representing Causal Structures and Mechanisms

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent AbstractResearch has highlighted the cognitive nature of the business model intended as a cognitive representation describing a business' value creation and value capture activities. Whereas the content of the business model has been extensively investigated from this perspective, less

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…BMfS, business modeling for sustainability; DBMfS, dynamic business modeling for sustainability [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] study strategy is particularly valuable to address theory-building research and to demonstrate that the existing research does not properly address the investigated propositions (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007). In this context, the case study research technique is likely to limit potential bias and enrich the analysis, offering useful insights on how to frame BMfS elements within a systemic structure (Furnari, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMfS, business modeling for sustainability; DBMfS, dynamic business modeling for sustainability [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] study strategy is particularly valuable to address theory-building research and to demonstrate that the existing research does not properly address the investigated propositions (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007). In this context, the case study research technique is likely to limit potential bias and enrich the analysis, offering useful insights on how to frame BMfS elements within a systemic structure (Furnari, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These actions and their real consequences are the source of experience and guide the subsequent identification of new combinations (Holland et al 1986;Levitt and March 1988) in a trial-and-error fashion (Mezger 2014;Sosna et al 2010). For cognitive search, managers instead rely on mental representations to identify new business models and assess their attractiveness according to established performance dimensions (Aspara et al 2011;Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart 2010;Doz and Kosonen 2010;Furnari 2015;Martins et al 2015;Porac et al 1989). These representations are conceptual structures held by individuals that contain a simplified understanding of their environmental reality (Lakoff 1987).…”
Section: Business Model Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting use of the CM's capabilities to represent dynamic information is the modeling of cause-effect (causal) relationships. Thus, the work [19] identifies the cognitive nature of a business model designated for a cognitive representation that describes business development activities. Attention is also drawn to the causeeffect structure of the business model, that is, the model of cause-effect relationships which, according to top managers or entrepreneurs' view, connects the creation of value and activities for its creation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%