2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2011.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coercive James’s weak compactness theorem and nonlinear variational problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation theorem provides x * * 0 ∈ B E * * and α < β satisfying (17) x * * 0 , x * < α < β < x * * 0 , x * 0 for every x * ∈ co(B) + Λ D · .…”
Section: Unbounded Nonlinear Weak * -James' Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The separation theorem provides x * * 0 ∈ B E * * and α < β satisfying (17) x * * 0 , x * < α < β < x * * 0 , x * 0 for every x * ∈ co(B) + Λ D · .…”
Section: Unbounded Nonlinear Weak * -James' Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results here are nonlinear analogues to those of [2,9] for weak * -James compactness results. This variational setting began with [17,18,22] and it was used to deal with robust representation of risk measures in mathematical finance. A main contribution reads as follows: Then the map f is weak * -lower semicontinuous and for every µ ∈ R, the sublevel set f −1 ((−∞, µ]) is weak * -compact.…”
Section: Unbounded Nonlinear Weak * -James' Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ϕ is finite-valued, this shows that lim Z 1 →∞ ϕ * (Z)/ Z 1 = ∞ (i.e., ϕ * is coercive). Then the implication (3) ⇒ (2) follows from coercive James's theorem due to [26] (recalled below as Theorem 5.2).…”
Section: Monotone Convex Functions On L ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ϕ(X + c) = ϕ(X) + c if c ∈ R), it was first obtained by [21] with an additional separability assumption, and the latter assumption was removed later by [10] using a homogenization trick. See also [26,27].…”
Section: Monotone Convex Functions On L ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next preparatory result is a version of James's theorem obtained by [14] which we shall use in the proof of (3) ⇒ (2). Theorem 2.2 ([14], Theorem 2).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%