1979
DOI: 10.1109/tit.1979.1056046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coding theorem for the discrete memoryless broadcast channel

Abstract: Abstmct-A coding theorem for the discrete memoryleas broadcast channel is proved for tbe case where no common message is to be transmitted. The theorem is a generalization of the results of Cover and van der Meulen on this problem. Tbe result is tight for broadcast channels having one deterministic component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
610
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(631 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
21
610
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To see that this is indeed an outer bound, note that it is simply the Körner-Marton [16] outer bound without the sum rate bound. The outer boundR 1 can be alternatively represented in terms of its supporting hyperplanes as:…”
Section: Effectively Less Noisy P-bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To see that this is indeed an outer bound, note that it is simply the Körner-Marton [16] outer bound without the sum rate bound. The outer boundR 1 can be alternatively represented in terms of its supporting hyperplanes as:…”
Section: Effectively Less Noisy P-bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difficulty for developing such a scheme can be perhaps recognized from the fact that the crucial component of Marton coding [13] for the (single-hop) broadcast channel is careful coordination between the codewords for different messages. For multihop networks, similar coordination becomes far more challenging since the source should control the codewords transmitted from multiple nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error probability analysis of theorem 1 here is similar to the error probability analysis process in Marton's classic paper [7], so the discussion will not be repeated here.…”
Section: Error Probability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%