2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Co-evolutionary Algorithm for Open-shop Scheduling with Disassembly Operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the table shows, the research on the multi-objective OSSP is still in its infancy. GA Minimize makespan [8] GA Minimize makespan [9] GA Minimize makespan [10] GA Minimize makespan [11] GA Minimize makespan [12] GA Minimize makespan [14] DE Minimize makespan [15] CEA Minimize makespan [17] MA Minimize makespan [18] MA Minimize makespan, total delay [19] MOEA Minimize makespan, , total machine workload [20] MOEA Minimize total flow time, minimize workload of people and machines [21] MOEA Minimize makespan and human error, maximize machine availability…”
Section: Evolution Algorithm For Solving Osspmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the table shows, the research on the multi-objective OSSP is still in its infancy. GA Minimize makespan [8] GA Minimize makespan [9] GA Minimize makespan [10] GA Minimize makespan [11] GA Minimize makespan [12] GA Minimize makespan [14] DE Minimize makespan [15] CEA Minimize makespan [17] MA Minimize makespan [18] MA Minimize makespan, total delay [19] MOEA Minimize makespan, , total machine workload [20] MOEA Minimize total flow time, minimize workload of people and machines [21] MOEA Minimize makespan and human error, maximize machine availability…”
Section: Evolution Algorithm For Solving Osspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the actual production scenario, customers often return goods. In view of this situation, Tanimizu [15] studied the OSSP including disassembly and post-processing operations, and proposed a co-evolutionary algorithm. However, the algorithm also takes too long in the face of large-scale problems.…”
Section: Emerging Evolutionary Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xia et al (2016) introduced a multi-objective disassembly sequence scheduling electronic waste to meet objectives concerning maximizing the index of diminished toxicity, recovery value, and recovery weighted. Tanimizu, Sakamoto, and Nonomiya (2017) developed a planning method for open-shop sequence planning problem considering disassembly and reprocessing operations. The paper of Fang et al (2019) provided optimization of disassembly balancing and sequencing with robotic workstations.…”
Section: Disassembly and Scheduling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the general dense scheduling algorithm (GDSA) for solving problems in a larger scale aimed at accelerating convergence. Tanimizu et al [29] presented a scheduling method for solving the open workshop problems including disassembly and post-processing operations. A co-evolutionary algorithm was designed to improve the sequence of operations and product loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%